Gas-sensor property of single-molecule device: F2 adsorbing effect
Li Zong-Liang1, †, Bi Jun-Jie1, Liu Ran1, Yi Xiao-Hua1, Fu Huan-Yan1, Sun Feng1, Wei Ming-Zhi1, 2, Wang Chuan-Kui1
School of Physics and Electronics, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Qilu University of Technology, Jinan 250353, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: lizongliang@sdnu.edu.cn

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11374195), the Taishan Scholar Project of Shandong Province, China, and the Jinan Youth Science and Technology Star Project, China (Grant No. 201406004).

Abstract

The single thiolated arylethynylene molecule with 9,10-dihydroanthracene core (denoted as TADHA) possesses pronounced negative differential conductance (NDC) behavior at lower bias regime. The adsorption effects of F2 molecule on the current and NDC behavior of TADHA molecular junctions are studied by applying non-equilibrium Green’s formalism combined with density functional theory. The numerical results show that the F2 molecule adsorbed on the benzene ring of TADHA molecule near the electrode can dramatically suppresses the current of TADHA molecular junction. When the F2 molecule adsorbed on the conjugated segment of 9,10-dihydroanthracene core of TADHA molecule, an obviously asymmetric effect on the current curves induces the molecular system showing apparent rectifier behavior. However, the current especially the NDC behavior have been significantly enlarged when F2 addition reacted with triple bond of TADHA molecule.

1. Introduction

Thanks to the rapid development of single-molecule technologies,[13] the molecular electronics have achieved great progresses in the last decade.[412] Nowadays, various kind of single-molecule junctions have been fabricated and lots of potential electronic performances have been found,[1020] such as molecular switch,[3,13] molecular rectifier,[1012] molecular transistor,[1418] molecular sensor,[19] molecular memory,[3] etc. Some of these performances originate from nonlinear electron-transport properties of molecular junctions,[10,11] while others need the responses of the electronic transport to the external influence on the molecular devices.[1419] Besides these performances, negative differential conductance (NDC) behavior is promised to have potential applications as switch, amplifier, memory, and so forth.[10,2123] In order to understand and improve the underlying functional properties, different strategies are developed to tune the electronic transport properties of molecular devices.[2432] The effects of molecule-electrode interface,[3336] electrode distance,[22,37] molecular anchor,[3843] side group,[13,44] external field,[1419,45] external ambient,[4649] doping,[5053] and contamination[54] have been studied intensively. Among those, small-molecule adsorbing or doping is an excellent choice by which the performance of molecular device can be modified selectively.[30,4854] Generally, the dipolar molecule or oxidative molecule can be applied as small molecule to adsorb on the molecular device to tune the performance of the molecular device.[29,49,5355] Recently, the single thiolated arylethynylene molecule with 9,10-dihydroanthracene core (denoted as TADHA) have been investigated experimentally by Perrin et al.[21] They found that, due to the non-conjugated 9,10-dihydroanthracene core separating two conjugated branches, the TADHA shows large NDC behavior at lower bias regime. Moreover, this low-bias NDC behavior can be modulated by electrode distance or dipolar adsorbate.[21,22,55] Motivated by Perrin’s and our work, in this paper, we particularly study the modulation effect of single F2 molecule adsorbed on the backbone of TADHA molecule. Our studies show that, F2 adsorbate shows different modulation effects on the electronic transport of TADHA molecular junction, such as enhancing or suppressing the current of molecular junction, or even inducing rectifier behavior when the F2 adsorbed on different positions of TADHA molecule backbone.

2. Theoretical model and computational details

In order to investigate the adsorption effect of F2 on TADHA molecular junction, we sandwiched TADHA molecule into the separation of two gold electrodes with F2 adsorbed on different sites of TADHA molecule backbone to form Au-TADHA+F2-Au systems. Here we denoted the molecular junction without F2 molecule as M0. After geometric optimizations, we found that there are four typical sites for F2 molecule to be adsorbed on (see Fig. 1): (i) the benzene ring site on one branch of TADHA molecule near the electrode, denoted as M1; (ii) one benzene ring site of 9,10-dihydroanthracene core near the triple bond, denoted as M2; (iii) one benzene ring site of 9,10-dihydroanthracene core near the non-conjugated segment, denoted as M3; (iv) triple bond site on one branch of TADHA molecule where the F2 molecule reacted with C–C triple bond by addition reaction as shown in Fig. 1(b), denoted as M4. Figure 1(b) shows that, for M4 molecular system, due to the addition reaction, one bond in the C–C triple bond has been broken and each of the two C atoms has been connected by one F atom. Consequently, the C–C triple bond has been converted into double bond. The geometries of TADHA molecular junctions with or without F2 molecules were optimized with a maximum force of 0.02 eV/Å in the SIESTA package.[56] The Troullier–Martin type norm-conserving pseudopotentials are applied to represent the core electrons, the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) with Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) formulation is applied as the exchange–correlation functional.[57] For Au atoms, a single-ζ plus polarization basis set is used, and for other atoms, a double-ζ plus polarization basis set is employed.

Fig. 1. (color online) (a) Schematic structure of TADHA molecular junctions without or with F2 molecule adsorbed on different sites; (b) process of F2 molecule reacting with TADHA molecule by addition reaction with C–C triple bond.

According to the Landauer–Buttiker formula,[58] the current with different bias for the molecular junction is written as

where T(E, V) is the transmission probability. μL and μR are the electrochemical potentials of the two electrodes. The transmission probability T(E,V) is calculated by the NEGF method employing the TranSIESTA module of the SIESTA package. After current calculations, the differential conductance is obtained by G = ∂I / ∂V. In the electron transport calculations, the convergence criterion for density matrix was set to 1.0 × 10−4. A 4 × 4 k-point grid was used for the Brillouin-zone (BZ) sampling in the transverse directions.

3. Results and discussion

The ground-state-geometry optimization of the molecular junctions shows that the affinities for F2 molecule adsorbed as M1, M2, and M3 molecular systems are about 0.24, 0.29, and 0.24 eV, which indicates that the F2 molecules in M1, M2, and M3 molecular systems are physically adsorbed on the TADHA molecule since the affinities are much less than 1 eV. While for M4 molecular system that the F2 is reacted with TADHA molecule by addition reaction on the C–C triple bond, the reaction energy is 5.11 eV. Thus for M4 molecular system, the F2 is evidently chemically adsorbed on TADHA molecule since the adsorption/reaction energy is obviously larger than 1 eV and more than one order of magnitude larger than the affinities of M1, M2, and M3 system. Here the adsorption affinity and the reaction energy are both defined as

where EExtended is the energy of Au-TADHA-Au extended molecular system, EF2 is the energy of single F2 molecule, and EComplex is the energy of each Au-TADHA+F2-Au complex molecular systems.

Figure 2 shows the current and the differential conductance as functions of bias voltage for TADHA molecular junctions without or with F2 adsorbate as M0, M1, M2, and M3 molecular systems. As shown by the experiment and our previous studies,[21,22] for the TADHA molecular junction without F2 adsorbate (M0), the current shows peak value at about ±0.25 V, and the NDC behavior appears when the absolute value of the bias voltage is higher than 0.25 V, which is an excellent low-bias NDC behavior. When one F2 molecule is adsorbed on TADHA molecule as M1, M2, and M3 systems, the currents in the lower bias regime are suppressed dramatically. Especially for the negative bias, the currents have been suppressed by more than one order of magnitude. However, for the positive bias, the currents for the M1, M2, and M3 obviously show different features. In detail, the current reaches the peak value swiftly at about 0.15 V and then decreases gradually in the lower bias regime. Correspondingly, the differential conductance and NDC are both very small for M1 junction. While for M2 and M3 systems, the currents reach their peak values at about 0.3 V and 0.4 V as well as the beginning bias of NDC behaviors, which are both larger than that of the system without F2 molecule (M0 system). At the same time, the peak NDC values are also suppressed by the adsorption of F2 molecule. It is noticeable that, the current curves of M2 and M3 show obvious rectifier features with the maximal rectification ratio up to 12.5 and 9.9, respectively, which is only 2.3 for M1 molecular system (see the inset of Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. (color online) Electronic transport properties of TADHA molecular junction with one F2 molecule adsorbate. (a) Current and (b) differential conductance as functions of applied bias voltage. The inset in panel (a) shows the rectification ratios (R) of the molecular systems versus bias voltage.

In order to understand the adsorption effect of F2 molecule on TADHA molecular system, we presented the transmission spectra for the bias voltages of 0.0 V, ±0.25 V, ±0.5 V, and the voltage of peak-current in Fig. 3. The NDC behavior of TADHA molecular junction without F2 adsorbate mainly due to the Stark effect of applied bias voltage which separated the degeneration of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and HOMO-1. At zero bias, both HOMO and HOMO-1 are delocalized orbitals. After the separation of the degeneration, the HOMO and HOMO-1 are only localized on one branch of the TADHA molecule respectively (Fig. 4), which correspondingly splits the high transmission peak located at −0.19 eV into two lower peaks (Fig. 3(a)). When the F2 molecule is adsorbed on TADHA molecule as M1, M2, and M3, in the lower negative bias regime, the transmission spectra shows similar character, that is, the transmission peaks corresponding to the HOMO shrink swiftly with the increase of the negative bias. Thus, in the lower negative bias regime, the currents of M1, M2, and M3 systems are very weak.

Fig. 3. (color online) Transmission spectra of TADHA molecular junctions. (a) Transmission spectra of TADHA molecular junction without F2 adsorbate; (b)–(d) transmission spectra of TADHA molecular junction with one F2 adsorbate as M1, M2, and M3 molecular systems that are shown in Fig. 1. The red dashed lines in panels (b)–(d) are the transmission spectra of TADHA molecular junction without F2 adsorbate at 0.25 V bias voltage, which are used as reference curves in the four figures.
Fig. 4. (color online) Spatial distributions of HOMOs and HOMOs-1 for TADHA molecular junctions without or with F2 molecule, where the orbital energies relative to the Fermi level are also shown under each orbital.

However, the transmission spectra show obvious differences for these three molecular systems at zero bias or in the positive bias regime. Figure 3(b) shows that, there is a high transmission peak at −0.14 eV for M1 molecular system, which is attributed to the two degenerated molecular orbitals of HOMO and HOMO-1. However, for M2 and M3 molecular systems, due to the separation of HOMO and HOMO-1 by the adsorption of F2 molecule, the transmission spectra show two peaks in the region of −0.4 ~ −0.1 eV, which indicates that F2 molecule adsorbed on the benzene ring site of 9,10-dihydroanthracene core destroys the degeneration of the HOMO and HOMO-1. However, with positive bias being applied, the HOMO is depressed, and at the same time the HOMO-1 is enhanced by bias, thus for M2 system, these two orbitals are re-degenerated and the transmission spectrum shows one high peak at 0.19 eV with bias of 0.10 V; for M3 system, the HOMO and HOMO-1 are re-degenerated and two corresponded transmission peaks are combined into one high peak at 0.23 eV with bias of 0.25 V. Attribute to the re-degeneration of the HOMO and HOMO-1 at positive bias, the transmission spectra shrinking speeds are obviously slower for positive bias than for negative bias for M2 and M3 molecular systems. Thus, the M2 and M3 molecular systems show obvious rectifier behavior.

To gain deep insight into electronic transport properties of TADHA molecular junctions with or without F2 adsorbates, we show spatial distributions of the HOMOs and HOMOs-1 for M0, M1, M2, and M3 molecular systems at 0.0 V, −0.25 V, ±0.5 V, and at the peak-current voltages in Fig. 4. The figure shows that, at zero bias, the HOMOs and HOMOs-1 are well delocalized over the whole TADHA molecule for M0 and M1 molecular systems. However, for M3 molecular system, The HOMO and HOMO-1 are almost localized on one branch of TADHA molecule. With the increase of the positive bias, the HOMO and HOMO-1 are re-delocalized at about 0.10 V and 0.25 V respectively for M2 and M3 molecular junction. One can see that, the F2 adsorbed on the core of TADHA molecule have larger influence on the frontier molecular orbitals than that of F2 adsorbed on the benzene ring near electrode. When lower negative bias (e.g., −0.25 V) is applied, due to the Stark effect, the HOMO and HOMO-1 are mainly localized on right or left branches respectively for M0, M1, M2, and M3 molecular system. However, the distribution of HOMO for M0 system shows an apparent difference from those of M1, M2, and M3 systems. In detail, a small proportion for the HOMO distributes on the left arm of TADHA molecule for M0 system. While for M1, M2, and M3 systems, due to the adsorptions of F2 molecule, the distributions of HOMO on the left benzene ring are negligible. Thus, one can understand why the currents in the lower negative bias regime are very weak for M1, M2, and M3. For positive bias, such as 0.30 V for M2 system and 0.40 V for M3 system, although the HOMOs mainly distribute on the left branch of TADHA molecule, there are also a small proportions on the right arm. Hence, the M2 and M3 molecular system are more conductive than M1 molecular system in the positive bias regime and present obvious rectifier behavior.

Different from M1, M2, and M3 molecular system, when F2 molecule reacts with TADHA molecule by addition reaction on the triple bond as M4 molecular system, the current and the NDC behavior are both enhanced dramatically. Figure 5(a) shows that except for the current value being enlarged by a factor of about 1.8, the variation trend of the current curve as well as the differential conductance curve of M4 molecular system are changed very slightly. Meanwhile, the peak NDC value is also doubled by the addition reaction of F2 molecule. From Fig. 5(b) one can see that, the transmission features of M4 system are very similar to those of M0 system. The main difference is the transmission spectra near the Fermi energy being enhanced a little, which is due to the fact the HOMO and HOMO-1 are slightly raised by the reaction of F2.

Fig. 5. (color online) Electronic transport properties of the molecular junction for the triple bond of TADHA molecule being fluoridated by F2 molecule. (a) Current and differential conductance as functions of applied bias voltage. (b) Transmission spectra for fluoridated TADHA molecular junction at different bias voltage. The dashed lines in panel (a) are the corresponding curves of TADHA molecular junction without F2 adsorbate, and the red dashed line in panel (b) is the transmission spectrum of TADHA molecular junction without F2 adsorbate at 0.25 V, which are used as reference curves in the figures.
4. Conclusions

Based on density functional theory and NEGF method, the F2 adsorption effects on the electron-transport properties and NDC behavior of TADHA molecular junctions are investigated theoretically. It is shown that F2 molecule adsorbed on the conjugated part of TADHA molecule can suppress the current and the NDC behavior of the molecular systems asymmetrically which further induces the molecular system showing apparent rectifier behavior, especially for the F2 molecule on the conjugated segment of 9,10-dihydroanthracene core of TADHA molecule. However, the current and the NDC behavior have been dramatically enlarged when F2 addition reacted with triple bond of TADHA molecule.

Reference
[1]CuiX DPrimakAZarateXTomfohrJSankeyO FMooreA LMooreT AGustDHarrisGLindsayS M 2001 Science 294 571
[2]XiangDJeongHLeeTMayerD 2013 Adv. Mater. 25 4845
[3]WangQLiuRXiangDSunMZhaoZSunLMeiTWuPLiuHGuoXLiZ LLeeT 2016 ACS Nano 10 9695
[4]JiangJKulaMLuoY 2006 J. Chem. Phys. 124 034708
[5]ZhangX JChenK QTangL MLongM Q 2011 Phys. Lett. 375 3319
[6]LiuRWangC KLiZ L 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 21946
[7]DouK PFuX XDe SarkarAZhangR Q 2016 Nano Res. 9 1480
[8]ZhangX JChenK QLongM QHeJGaoY L 2015 Mod. Phys. Lett. 29 1550106
[9]LiZ L 2011 Chin. J. Chem. Phys. 24 194
[10]ZhangZGuoCKwongD JLiJDengXFanZ 2013 Adv. Funct. Mater. 23 2765
[11]HuG CZhangZLiYRenJ FWangC K 2016 Chin. Phys. 25 057308
[12]ZhangG PWangSWeiM ZHuG CWangC K 2017 J. Phys. Chem. 121 7643
[13]FuX XZhangL XLiZ LWangC K 2013 Chin. Phys. 22 028504
[14]XuB QLiX LXiaoX YSakaguchiHTaoN J 2005 Nano Lett. 5 1491
[15]LiZ LZhangG PWangC K 2011 J. Phys. Chem. 115 15586
[16]LiZ LFuX XZhangG PWangC K 2013 Chin J. Chem. Phys. 26 185
[17]SuWJiangJLuWLuoY 2006 Nano Lett. 6 2091
[18]XiangDJeongHKimDLeeTChengYWangQMayerD 2013 Nano Lett. 13 2809
[19]XuB QXiaoX YYangX MZangLTaoN J 2005 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 2386
[20]WangF YLiG Q 2016 Chin. Phys. 25 077304
[21]PerrinM LFrisendaRKooleMSeldenthuisJ SGilJ A CValkenierHHummelenJ CRenaudNGrozemaF CThijssenJ MDulićD 2014 Nat. Nanotech. 9 830
[22]YiX HLiuRBiJ JJiaoYWangC KLiZ L 2016 Chin. Phys. 25 128503
[23]LiY HYanQZhouL PHanQ 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 057301 in Chinese
[24]XiangDZhangYPyatkovFOffenhäusserAMayerD 2011 Chem. Commun. 47 4760
[25]XuB QTaoN J 2003 Science 301 1221
[26]LiuRBaoD LJiaoYWanL WLiZ LWangC K 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 068501 in Chinese
[27]ZhangY FYiX HZhangZSunJ XLiZ L2015J. At. Mol. Sci.6263
[28]XiangDLeeTKimYMeiT TWangQ L 2014 Nanoscale 6 13396
[29]ZhaoW KCuiBFangC FJiG MZhaoJ FKongX RZouD QJiangX HLiD MLiuD S 2015 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17 3115
[30]SongYXieZMaYLiZ LWangC K 2014 J. Phys. Chem. 118 18713
[31]ZouDZhaoWFangCCuiBLiuD 2016 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 11513
[32]WangSWeiM ZHuG CWangC KZhangG P 2017 Org. Electron. 49 76
[33]ZhaoW KJiG MLiuD S 2014 Phys. Lett. 378 446
[34]LiYZhangG PXieZZhangZRenJ FWangC KHuG C 2016 Chin. J. Chem. Phys. 29 344
[35]JiangZ LWangHShenZ YSanvitoSHouS M 2016 J. Chem. Phys. 145 044701
[36]HuG CZuoM YLiYZhangZRenJ FWangC K 2015 Chin. Phys. 24 077308
[37]ZhangG PHuG CSongYXieZWangC K 2013 J. Chem. Phys. 139 094702
[38]LiM JXuHChenK QLongM Q 2012 Phys. Lett. 376 1692
[39]HongWManriqueD ZMoreno-GarciaPGulcurMMishchenkoALambertC JBryceM RWandlowskiT 2012 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 2292
[40]HongWLiHLiuS XFuYLiJKaliginediVDecurtinsSWandlowskiT 2012 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 19425
[41]BaoD LLiuRLengJ CZuoXJiaoYLiZ LWangC K 2014 Phys. Lett. 378 1290
[42]ChenFLiXHihathJHuangZTaoN 2006 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 15874
[43]YokotaKTaniguchiMTsutsuiMKawaiT 2010 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 17364
[44]XiangDPyatkovFSchröperFOffenhäusserAZhangYMayerD 2011 Chem. Eur. J. 17 13166
[45]NaJ SAyresJChandraK LGormanC BParsonsG N 2007 Nanotech. 18 424001
[46]CaoHMaJLuoY 2010 Nano Res. 3 350
[47]LinX NZhangG PRenJ FYuanX BHuG C 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 068502 in Chinese
[48]LiZ LLiH ZMaYZhangG PWangC K 2010 Chin. Phys. 19 067305
[49]LongD PLazorcikJ LMantoothB AMooreM HRatnerM ATroisiAYaoY XCiszekJ WTourJ MShashidharR 2006 Nat. Mater. 5 901
[50]ZouD QSongYXieZLiZ LWangC K 2015 Phys. Lett. 379 1842
[51]TianWYuanP FYuZ LTaoB KHouS YYeCZhangZ H 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 046102 in Chinese
[52]ChenYHuH FWangX WZhangZ JChengC P 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 196101 in Chinese
[53]YangZLangN DDi VentraM 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 82 1938
[54]ZhangZ HDengX QTanX QQiuMPanJ B 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 97 183105
[55]LiZ LYiX HLiuRBiJ JFuH YZhangG PSongY ZWangC K 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 4195
[56]BrandbygeMMozosJ LOrdejnPTaylorJStokbroK 2002 Phys. Rev. 65 165401
[57]PerdewJ PBurkeKErnzerhofM 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865
[58]ButtikerMImryYLandauerRPinhasS 1985 Phys. Rev. 31 6207